For Pharma R&D Teams

Pharma R&D Guide to AI Training Data

Pharma AI teams spend more time negotiating data access than building models.

Every major pharmaceutical company has an AI/ML division. Every one of these divisions is blocked on the same problem: accessing real clinical data from hospitals and imaging centres to train their models. The standard approach — sponsor a clinical study, collect prospective data, wait 2-3 years — is incompatible with the pace of AI development. By the time the data arrives, the model architecture has advanced two generations.

Discussion: Head of AI at a top-10 pharma company

"We spent 18 months negotiating access to oncology imaging data from three NHS trusts. The legal costs alone exceeded 200K GBP. By the time we got access, our ML team had moved on to a different architecture. With Rapha's compute-to-data model, we were training within weeks of the initial conversation. The difference for pharma is: you're not waiting for data. You're waiting for institutional approval to run compute. That's a much faster conversation than negotiating data export."

Pharma AI use cases that fit the compute-to-data model

Regulatory advantage: auditable training provenance

For pharma companies submitting AI/ML models to regulators (FDA, EMA, MHRA), training data provenance is increasingly scrutinised. Rapha Protocol's cryptographic proof receipts provide auditable evidence of: which dataset was used, which model was trained, how many records were processed, and that raw PHI was not exported. This audit trail is specifically designed to support regulatory submissions.